Section outline

  • An illustration of the Ohana debate by Honen Shonin Eden.

    Sed auctor mauris sed sapien ullamcorper tempor. Morbi suscipit gravida neque sed lobortis. Aliquam at neque iaculis, dictum est ut, dignissim odio. In sed maximus neque. Proin ut sem eu elit cursus convallis. Nulla vitae facilisis quam. Nulla sit amet metus ornare, vulputate leo tristique, ullamcorper est. Nam at libero sit amet risus facilisis pulvinar. Phasellus eu tristique eros, euismod mattis orci. Integer elementum volutpat justo eu ultricies. Morbi malesuada justo at purus placerat, ut porttitor odio sodales. Nulla consequat, ante ut bibendum varius, ex dui gravida justo, non hendrerit quam eros ut neque. Ut et posuere enim, ac tristique risus. Pellentesque vehicula tellus turpis, ut commodo eros consequat ut. Ut nec ligula non ex venenatis porttitor eu ut tortor.

    Activities
    • Use this week's Miro board to discuss the criteria that you consider important when evaluating a speech that someone delivered with little preparation time. How does it differ from the criteria you decided on as a group in week 1?
    • Share a short prompt for a speech on Miro by Wednesday evening. Ideally, these should be topics that anyone would at least be aware of and should not require too much research (see the Miro board for examples).
    • In our synchronous online tutorial on Thursday, you will each draw one of the prompts. You will have ten minutes to generate a few ideas and arguments using the techniques we discussed last week before presenting them in a 1-minute speech. 
    • Take notes while other people are speaking using the criteria the course decided on earlier in the week and provide constructive feedback. 
    • As a group, summarise all of the feedback and add it to the course glossary.