Programme handbook
Assessment and feedback
Common post graduate marking scheme
The University’s common postgraduate marking scheme below is used for degree assessment. Check the links for more information:
https://www.ed.ac.uk/academic-services/policies-regulations/regulations
http://www.ed.ac.uk/student-administration/exams/regulations/common-marking-scheme
https://www.ed.ac.uk/timetabling-examinations/exams/regulations/common-marking-scheme
The MScCT programme uses the SOLO* criteria as follows:
Mark (%) |
Grade |
Description |
Taxonomy |
SOLO Criteria |
90 -100 |
A1 |
An excellent performance, satisfactory for a distinction |
Extended abstract |
The student has independently explored and evaluated new approaches and techniques beyond the course material and identified weaknesses in current research practice and presentation. Student has consistently questioned and challenged existing theory, principles and current research protocol and has demonstrated novel solutions to known and unknown problems. |
80 - 89 |
A2 |
An excellent performance, satisfactory for a distinction |
Extended abstract |
Student has shown initiative to explore novel ideas and alternatives to current clinical research and practice |
70 - 79 |
A3 |
An excellent performance, satisfactory for a distinction |
Extended abstract |
Student has abstracted existing concepts and ideas and can apply these to new and unrelated situations |
60 - 69 |
B |
A very good performance |
Relational |
Student has shown evidence of integration of concepts and ideas and can apply these to familiar clinical scenarios |
50 - 59 |
C |
A good performance, satisfactory for a master’s degree |
Multi-structural |
Student has demonstrated evidence of learning events that include a number of topic related independent concepts and issues without making connections or identifying relationships between them |
40 – 49 |
D |
A satisfactory performance for the Diploma, but inadequate for a Masters degree |
Uni-structural |
Student has demonstrated evidence of isolated learning events that focus on individual concepts or issues clearly related to the assigned tasks |
30 – 39 |
E |
Marginal Fail |
Pre-structural |
Student has not shown any evidence of learning beyond repeating isolated pieces of information unrelated to the assigned tasks or requirements |
20 - 29 |
F |
Clear Fail |
Clear fail |
Student has not presented any evidence of original learning |
10 - 19 |
G |
Bad Fail |
Bad fail |
Student has shown no evidence of learning |
0 - 9 |
H |
Bad Fail |
Bad fail |
Student has not been present for learning |
*SOLO: Structure Of the Observed Learning Outcome - a taxonomy developed by John Biggs in 1982
http://www.johnbiggs.com.au/academic/solo-taxonomy/
Students must comply with any assessment requirements specific to their degree programme and the University’s taught assessment regulations for the current academic session.